Comparison
Shirstaki vs Glasnudeln
Overall, Shirstaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Shirstaki | Glasnudeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Shirstaki has 97% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Glasnudeln has no fat, while Shirstaki has 0.5 g.
- Glasnudeln has no sugar, while Shirstaki has 0.5 g.
- Shirstaki has 100% more fiber (3.5 g vs 0 g).
- Shirstaki has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Shirstaki
Water, konjac flour 3%, acidity regulator (citric acid), firming agent (calcium hydroxide).
Glasnudeln
Mungo grah (Vigna radiata), grašak, voda.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Shirstaki or Glasnudeln?
Overall, Shirstaki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Shirstaki has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Glasnudeln has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.