Vegetable stock pot vs Groentebouillon
Overall, Groentebouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vegetable stock pot | Groentebouillon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 5 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Groentebouillon has 66% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Vegetable stock pot has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Groentebouillon has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Vegetable stock pot lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Vegetable stock pot
Concentrated vegetable stock Ingredients 63% Concentrated Vegetable Stock (Water, Celeriac, Carrot, Celery, Red Pepper, Onion, Leek, Cabbage), Salt, Natural Flavourings (contain Celery), Sunflower Oil, Yeast Extract, Gelling Agents: Agar, Xanthan Gum; Spices (Turmeric, Parsley, Lovage, Black Pepper, Nutmeg), Sugar, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid. Allergy Advice For allergens, see ingredients in hold. Mai
Groentebouillon
Maïszetmeel*, zout, palmvet*, groenten* 11,5% (in wisselende verhoudingen: wortelen, pastinaak, ui, prei), gistextract, natuurlijk aroma, specerijen (nootmuskaat, knoflook*, kurkuma*, peper*), kruiden* (lavas peterselie*). van biologische oorsprong.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vegetable stock pot or Groentebouillon?
Overall, Groentebouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vegetable stock pot has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Groentebouillon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.