Comparison

Stock pots - Vegetable vs Groentebouillon

Overall, Groentebouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientStock pots - VegetableGroentebouillon
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 6 kcal 7 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.1 g
Additives30
AllergensCeleryNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Groentebouillon has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Groentebouillon has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Groentebouillon has 68% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Stock pots - Vegetable has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Stock pots - Vegetable has 80% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Groentebouillon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Stock pots - Vegetable lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Stock pots - Vegetable

concentrated vegetable stock (62%) (water, carrot, tomato, red pepper, celery, onion, leek, cabbage), salt, sunflower oil, flavourings (contains celery), sugar, yeast extract, gelling agents: agar, xanthan gum, turmeric, parsley, acidity regulator: lactic acid

Groentebouillon

Maïszetmeel*, zout, palmvet*, groenten* 11,5% (in wisselende verhoudingen: wortelen, pastinaak, ui, prei), gistextract, natuurlijk aroma, specerijen (nootmuskaat, knoflook*, kurkuma*, peper*), kruiden* (lavas peterselie*). van biologische oorsprong.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Stock pots - Vegetable or Groentebouillon?

Overall, Groentebouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stock pots - Vegetable has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Groentebouillon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons