Vegajo Vegaföl vs Gochujang korean chili paste
Overall, Vegajo Vegaföl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vegajo Vegaföl | Gochujang korean chili paste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 193 kcal | 233 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 25.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 6.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vegajo Vegaföl has 17% fewer calories (193 kcal vs 233 kcal).
- Gochujang korean chili paste has 89% less fat (2.2 g vs 20 g).
- Gochujang korean chili paste has 97% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 18 g).
- Vegajo Vegaföl has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 25.2 g).
- Vegajo Vegaföl has 92% less salt (0.5 g vs 6.6 g).
- Gochujang korean chili paste has 80% more protein (5 g vs 1 g).
- Vegajo Vegaföl has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gochujang korean chili paste lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Vegajo Vegaföl
ivóvíz, kókuszzsír 20%, dextróz, keményítő, babfehérje, trikalcium-foszfát, inaktív élesztő, tengeri só, baktérium-színtenyészet.
Gochujang korean chili paste
Rice, water, corn syrup, red pepper powder, salt, soybeans, alcohol, wheat extract, soy seasoning (soybeans, wheat gluten, salt, alcohol, yeast extract, maltodextrin), garlic concentrate, koji-starter
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vegajo Vegaföl or Gochujang korean chili paste?
Overall, Vegajo Vegaföl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vegajo Vegaföl has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vegajo Vegaföl has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 25.2 g per 100 g.