Comparison

Tuna Fillet vs Atún claro en aceite de oliva

Overall, Tuna Fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTuna FilletAtún claro en aceite de oliv...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 97 kcal 245 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 31 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 4.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 26 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, ThunfischNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuna Fillet has 60% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 245 kcal).
  • Tuna Fillet has 98% less fat (0.7 g vs 31 g).
  • Tuna Fillet has 93% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Tuna Fillet has no sugar, while Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
  • Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 30% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Tuna Fillet has 27% more protein (26 g vs 19 g).
  • Tuna Fillet has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Tuna Fillet lists: Fish, Thunfisch.

Ingredients

Tuna Fillet

Thunfisch, Wasser, Speisesalz.

Atún claro en aceite de oliva

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tuna Fillet or Atún claro en aceite de oliva?

Overall, Tuna Fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuna Fillet has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuna Fillet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons