Tuna Fillet vs Atún claro en aceite de oliva
Overall, Tuna Fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuna Fillet | Atún claro en aceite de oliv... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 97 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Thunfisch | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Fillet has 60% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 245 kcal).
- Tuna Fillet has 98% less fat (0.7 g vs 31 g).
- Tuna Fillet has 93% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 4.6 g).
- Tuna Fillet has no sugar, while Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
- Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 30% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Tuna Fillet has 27% more protein (26 g vs 19 g).
- Tuna Fillet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tuna Fillet lists: Fish, Thunfisch.
Ingredients
Tuna Fillet
Thunfisch, Wasser, Speisesalz.
Atún claro en aceite de oliva
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuna Fillet or Atún claro en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Tuna Fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Fillet has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Fillet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.