Thon vs Atún claro en aceite de oliva
Overall, Atún claro en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon | Atún claro en aceite de oliv... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 31% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Thon has 39% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 4.6 g).
- Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 48% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Atún claro en aceite de oliva has 37% more protein (19 g vs 12 g).
- Only Thon lists: Eggs, Fish.
Ingredients
Thon
_Thon_ 35%, huile de colza, eau, jaune d'_œuf_, fibres de canne à sucre, sirop de sucre inverti, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, amidon modifié de maïs, amidon de maïs, extraits de légumes (pois et carottes), conservateurs : sorbate de potassium et acétates de sodium, acidifiants : lactate de sodium, épaississants : gomme guar et gomme xanthane. Traces possibles de gluten, crustacés, soja, lait, céleri et moutarde
Atún claro en aceite de oliva
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon or Atún claro en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Atún claro en aceite de oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún claro en aceite de oliva has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún claro en aceite de oliva has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.