Comparison

Truite pyrenees vs Gerookte forelfilets

Overall, Gerookte forelfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTruite pyreneesGerookte forelfilets
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 158 kcal 138 kcal
Fat 8 g 5.5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.4 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 22 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, Poisson

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gerookte forelfilets has 13% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 158 kcal).
  • Gerookte forelfilets has 31% less fat (5.5 g vs 8 g).
  • Gerookte forelfilets has 85% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Truite pyrenees is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Gerookte forelfilets lists: Poisson.

Ingredients

Truite pyrenees

poisson (100%)

Gerookte forelfilets

97 % truite arc-en-ciel (Oncorhynchus mykiss, élevée au Danemark), sel. Contient du poisson.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Truite pyrenees or Gerookte forelfilets?

Overall, Gerookte forelfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gerookte forelfilets has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Truite pyrenees has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons