Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves vs Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois
Overall, Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes et pieds de veau au v... | Tripes du sauget au vin d'ar... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 32% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 112 kcal).
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 64% less fat (1.8 g vs 5 g).
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 59% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 38% more protein (16.7 g vs 10.3 g).
Ingredients
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Tripes de veau (51 %), pieds de veau (10 %), eau, vin blanc de Graves (3,4 %), oignons, ventrêche, ail, sel, amidon de maïs modifié, persil, huile de tournesol, poivre, épices.
Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves or Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois?
Overall, Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.