Comparison

Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois vs Tripes à la languedocienne

Overall, Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripes du sauget au vin d'ar...Tripes à la languedocienne
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 76 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.1 g
Protein 10.3 g 16.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 13% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 87 kcal).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 28% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 30% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 30% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 37% more protein (16.4 g vs 10.3 g).
  • Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois

Not available.

Tripes à la languedocienne

Panse de boeuf, couenne et pieds de porc, vin blanc, tomates concentrées, oignons, carottes, jambon sec, épices, sel, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois or Tripes à la languedocienne?

Overall, Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons