Tripes à la languedocienne vs Trippa al sugo
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Tripes à la languedocienne
Trippa al sugo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la languedocienne | Trippa al sugo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 16.4 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trippa al sugo has 11% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 87 kcal).
- Tripes à la languedocienne has 44% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Trippa al sugo has 38% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Tripes à la languedocienne has 38% less sugar (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Tripes à la languedocienne has 39% more protein (16.4 g vs 10 g).
- Trippa al sugo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tripes à la languedocienne
Panse de boeuf, couenne et pieds de porc, vin blanc, tomates concentrées, oignons, carottes, jambon sec, épices, sel, poivre.
Trippa al sugo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la languedocienne or Trippa al sugo?
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trippa al sugo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes à la languedocienne has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.