Tripes à la mode corse vs Trippa al sugo
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la mode corse | Trippa al sugo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trippa al sugo has 33% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Tripes à la mode corse has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Tripes à la mode corse has 25% more protein (13.4 g vs 10 g).
- Trippa al sugo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tripes à la mode corse
Panses, bonnets, feuillets et caillettes de boeuf en proportion eau, olives noires 2,72 %, pieds de bœuf, oignons tomates, sel épices arômes naturels, herbes du maquis : paprika, gélatine, acidifiants : gluconate ferreux (olives), acétate de sodium, acide citrique.
Trippa al sugo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la mode corse or Trippa al sugo?
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trippa al sugo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes à la mode corse has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.