Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda vs Trippa al sugo
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda | Trippa al sugo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trippa al sugo has 52% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- Trippa al sugo has 74% less fat (2.3 g vs 8.9 g).
- Trippa al sugo has 74% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.1 g).
- Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda has 44% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda has 38% more protein (16.1 g vs 10 g).
- Trippa al sugo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda
Chicken raised without antibiotics, Gouda cheese (pasteurized milk, cheese cultures, salt, enzymes, annatto color), caramelized onion, red pepper, kosher salt, spices, garlic, onion, tomato powder (tomato, maltodextrin, corn starch), dried citrus pulp, extract of rosemary, vinegar. Contains: milk.
Trippa al sugo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda or Trippa al sugo?
Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trippa al sugo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.