Comparison

Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda vs Tripes à la languedocienne

Overall, Tripes à la languedocienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken Burger-Onion&HoudaTripes à la languedocienne
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 161 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 8.9 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.9 g 1 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 16.1 g 16.4 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 46% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 161 kcal).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 86% less fat (1.3 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 59% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 24% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda

Chicken raised without antibiotics, Gouda cheese (pasteurized milk, cheese cultures, salt, enzymes, annatto color), caramelized onion, red pepper, kosher salt, spices, garlic, onion, tomato powder (tomato, maltodextrin, corn starch), dried citrus pulp, extract of rosemary, vinegar. Contains: milk.

Tripes à la languedocienne

Panse de boeuf, couenne et pieds de porc, vin blanc, tomates concentrées, oignons, carottes, jambon sec, épices, sel, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda or Tripes à la languedocienne?

Overall, Tripes à la languedocienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes à la languedocienne has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons