Comparison

Tripes vs Tripes à la languedocienne

Overall, Tripes à la languedocienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripesTripes à la languedocienne
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 103 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 3.8 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 1 g 1.1 g
Protein 17 g 16.4 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 16% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 66% less fat (1.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 39% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Tripes has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Tripes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tripes à la languedocienne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tripes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Tripes

Panse de bœuf français (71%), oignons, carottes, gélatine de porc vin blanc SULFITES), poireau, sel, poivre.

Tripes à la languedocienne

Panse de boeuf, couenne et pieds de porc, vin blanc, tomates concentrées, oignons, carottes, jambon sec, épices, sel, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes or Tripes à la languedocienne?

Overall, Tripes à la languedocienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes à la languedocienne has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons