Tripes vs Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Overall, Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tripes
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes | Tripes et pieds de veau au v... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 103 kcal | 112 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes has 24% less fat (3.8 g vs 5 g).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tripes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Tripes
Panse de bœuf français (71%), oignons, carottes, gélatine de porc vin blanc SULFITES), poireau, sel, poivre.
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Tripes de veau (51 %), pieds de veau (10 %), eau, vin blanc de Graves (3,4 %), oignons, ventrêche, ail, sel, amidon de maïs modifié, persil, huile de tournesol, poivre, épices.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes or Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves?
Overall, Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.