Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda vs Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Overall, Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda | Tripes et pieds de veau au v... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 112 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 30% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 44% less fat (5 g vs 8.9 g).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 30% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 43% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda
Chicken raised without antibiotics, Gouda cheese (pasteurized milk, cheese cultures, salt, enzymes, annatto color), caramelized onion, red pepper, kosher salt, spices, garlic, onion, tomato powder (tomato, maltodextrin, corn starch), dried citrus pulp, extract of rosemary, vinegar. Contains: milk.
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves
Tripes de veau (51 %), pieds de veau (10 %), eau, vin blanc de Graves (3,4 %), oignons, ventrêche, ail, sel, amidon de maïs modifié, persil, huile de tournesol, poivre, épices.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Burger-Onion&Houda or Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves?
Overall, Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.