Comparison

Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves vs Tripes à la languedocienne

Overall, Tripes à la languedocienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripes et pieds de veau au v...Tripes à la languedocienne
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 112 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 5 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.1 g
Protein 16.7 g 16.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 22% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 112 kcal).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 74% less fat (1.3 g vs 5 g).
  • Tripes à la languedocienne has 41% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tripes à la languedocienne is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves

Tripes de veau (51 %), pieds de veau (10 %), eau, vin blanc de Graves (3,4 %), oignons, ventrêche, ail, sel, amidon de maïs modifié, persil, huile de tournesol, poivre, épices.

Tripes à la languedocienne

Panse de boeuf, couenne et pieds de porc, vin blanc, tomates concentrées, oignons, carottes, jambon sec, épices, sel, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves or Tripes à la languedocienne?

Overall, Tripes à la languedocienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes à la languedocienne has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes et pieds de veau au vin blanc de Graves has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons