Comparison

Tripes vs Trippa al sugo

Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Tripes	Trippa al sugo
Nutri-Score	b	b
NOVA group	4	—
Calories	103 kcal	77 kcal
Fat	3.8 g	2.3 g
Saturated fat	2.1 g	0.8 g
Sugars	0.5 g	1.6 g
Salt	1 g	1.1 g
Fiber	—	1 g
Protein	17 g	10 g
Additives	1	0
Allergens	Sulphur dioxide and sulphites	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Trippa al sugo has 25% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 103 kcal).
Trippa al sugo has 40% less fat (2.3 g vs 3.8 g).
Trippa al sugo has 62% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2.1 g).
Tripes has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
Tripes has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
Only Tripes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Tripes

Panse de bœuf français (71%), oignons, carottes, gélatine de porc vin blanc SULFITES), poireau, sel, poivre.

Trippa al sugo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes or Trippa al sugo?

Overall, Trippa al sugo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trippa al sugo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Tripes vs Tripes à la mode corse Tripes à la mode corse vs Trippa al sugo Tripes vs Tripes à la languedocien... Tripes à la languedocien... vs Trippa al sugo Tripes vs Tripes et pieds de veau... Tripes et pieds de veau... vs Trippa al sugo Chicken Burger-Onion&Hou... vs Tripes Chicken Burger-Onion&Hou... vs Trippa al sugo