Tourteau Chair & Pattes vs Scampi
Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tourteau Chair & Pattes | Scampi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 207 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | Crustaceans, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 68% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 207 kcal).
- Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 7.7 g).
- Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Scampi has 71% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 38% more protein (16 g vs 10 g).
- Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Tourteau Chair & Pattes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Scampi lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Tourteau Chair & Pattes
Tourteau, eau, sel, sucre, acidifiant : E330
Scampi
Breadcrumbs (Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Yeast, Dextrose, Salt), Scampi (Crustaceans) (33%), Batter (Water, Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Wheat Starch, Salt, Colour: E160c), Water, Rapeseed Oil, Stabilisers (E339, E451, E452)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tourteau Chair & Pattes or Scampi?
Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tourteau Chair & Pattes has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Scampi has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.