Comparison

Tourteau Chair & Pattes vs Young's Scampi

Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTourteau Chair & PattesYoung's Scampi
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 67 kcal 214 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.8 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.3 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 16 g 9.4 g
Additives15
AllergensCrustaceansCrustaceans, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 69% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 214 kcal).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 41% more protein (16 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Young's Scampi lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Tourteau Chair & Pattes

Tourteau, eau, sel, sucre, acidifiant : E330

Young's Scampi

Scampi (37%) (_Crustacean_), Wheat Flour (_Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Rapeseed Oil, Water, Potato Starch, _Wheat_ Starch, Rice Flour, _Wheat_ Gluten, Modified Maize Starch, Yeast, Salt, _Oat_ Fibre, Raising Agents (Diphosphates, Sodium Bicarbonate), Stabilisers (Sodium Carbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate, Citric Acid), Dextrose, Cornflour, White Pepper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tourteau Chair & Pattes or Young's Scampi?

Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourteau Chair & Pattes has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourteau Chair & Pattes has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons