Comparison

Tourteau Chair & Pattes vs Wholetail SCAMPI

Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTourteau Chair & PattesWholetail SCAMPI
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 67 kcal 211 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 8.9 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.9 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 16 g 10.7 g
Additives12
AllergensCrustaceansCrustaceans, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 68% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 211 kcal).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Wholetail SCAMPI has 41% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 33% more protein (16 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Wholetail SCAMPI lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Tourteau Chair & Pattes

Tourteau, eau, sel, sucre, acidifiant : E330

Wholetail SCAMPI

Scampi (crustaceans) (37%), wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), water, rapeseed oil, rice flour, maize flour, wheat starch, potato starch, maize starch, wheat gluten, salt, yeast, stabiliser: triphosphates, colour: paprika extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tourteau Chair & Pattes or Wholetail SCAMPI?

Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourteau Chair & Pattes has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourteau Chair & Pattes has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons