Comparison

Tourteau Chair & Pattes vs Jumbo Wholetail Scampi

Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTourteau Chair & PattesJumbo Wholetail Scampi
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 67 kcal 201 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 7.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber — 0.9 g
Protein 16 g 10.1 g
Additives15
AllergensCrustaceansCrustaceans, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 67% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 201 kcal).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 93% less fat (0.5 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 83% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has 37% more protein (16 g vs 10.1 g).
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tourteau Chair & Pattes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Jumbo Wholetail Scampi lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Tourteau Chair & Pattes

Tourteau, eau, sel, sucre, acidifiant : E330

Jumbo Wholetail Scampi

Scampi (40%) (Crustacean), Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin (B3), Thiamin (B1)], Water, Rapeseed Oil, Potato Starch, Wheat Starch, Rice Flour, Wheat Gluten, Modified Maize Starch, Salt, Oat Fibre, Yeast, Raising Agents: Diphosphates, Sodium Bicarbonate; Stabilisers: Sodium Carbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate, Citric Acid; Cornflour, White Pepper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tourteau Chair & Pattes or Jumbo Wholetail Scampi?

Overall, Tourteau Chair & Pattes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourteau Chair & Pattes has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 201 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourteau Chair & Pattes has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons