Comparison

Tomato chutney vs Rich tangy tomato chutney

Overall, Tomato chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomato chutneyRich tangy tomato chutney
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 170 kcal 195 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 37.9 g 45 g
Salt 0.8 g 2.1 g
Fiber 2.4 g 0.8 g
Protein 1.1 g 1.2 g
Additives01
AllergensGluten, MustardGluten, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomato chutney has 13% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 195 kcal).
  • Tomato chutney has 16% less sugar (37.9 g vs 45 g).
  • Tomato chutney has 61% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Tomato chutney has 66% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Tomato chutney has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tomato chutney

Sucre • Pommes Bramley • Tomates (14%) 'Vinaigre de malt d'orge • Concentré de tomate 7%) Eau • Tomates rôties lentement (4%) • Huile d'olive vierge exta • Vinaigre de vin blanc • Marjolaine • Sucre muscovado • Oignons • Oignons rouges • Fécule de maïs • Oignons déshydratés • Sel • Purée d'ail • Purée de gingembre • Jus de citron concentré • graines de moutarde jaune • Poivre noir moulu

Rich tangy tomato chutney

tomato (52%), sugar, barley malt vinegar, diced tomato (8%), diced red pepper (2%), onion puree, salt, diced green pepper, garlic puree, ginger puree, ground paprika, acidity regulator (citric acid), mustard seeds

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomato chutney or Rich tangy tomato chutney?

Overall, Tomato chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomato chutney has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomato chutney has less sugar: 37.9 g versus 45 g per 100 g.

More comparisons