Tomato and chilli chutney vs Rich tangy tomato chutney
Overall, Tomato and chilli chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Tomato and chilli chutney
Rich tangy tomato chutney
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomato and chilli chutney | Rich tangy tomato chutney |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 195 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 44.4 g | 45 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Gluten, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomato and chilli chutney has 19% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Tomato and chilli chutney has 32% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Tomato and chilli chutney has 29% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Only Rich tangy tomato chutney lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Tomato and chilli chutney
Sugar, Water, Tomato (14%), Red Wine Vinegar, Bramley Apple, Tomato Paste (7%), Bramley Apple Purée, Dried Onion, Garlic Purée, Salt, Mustard Seeds, Habanero Chilli (0.4%), Salt, Acidity Regulator: Acetic Acid, Dried Chillies
Rich tangy tomato chutney
tomato (52%), sugar, barley malt vinegar, diced tomato (8%), diced red pepper (2%), onion puree, salt, diced green pepper, garlic puree, ginger puree, ground paprika, acidity regulator (citric acid), mustard seeds
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomato and chilli chutney or Rich tangy tomato chutney?
Overall, Tomato and chilli chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomato and chilli chutney has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomato and chilli chutney has less sugar: 44.4 g versus 45 g per 100 g.