Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl vs Atún Claro en Aceite de Girasol
Overall, Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl
Atún Claro en Aceite de Girasol
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblu... | Atún Claro en Aceite de Gira... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 162 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 26.5 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has 36% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has 65% less fat (6.3 g vs 18 g).
- Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has 66% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has no sugar, while Atún Claro en Aceite de Girasol has 0.5 g.
- Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has 21% more protein (26.5 g vs 21 g).
- Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl
78% Thunfisch, Sonnenblumenöl, Speisesalz. 'Gewichts - verlust durch Erhitzen. Ungeöffnet
Atún Claro en Aceite de Girasol
_Atún claro_, aceite de girasol y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl or Atún Claro en Aceite de Girasol?
Overall, Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thunfischfilets in Sonnenblumenöl has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.