Comparison

Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable vs Atún claro al natural

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon albacore au naturel pêc...Atún claro al natural
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 129 kcal 114 kcal
Fat 2 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 27 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atún claro al natural has 12% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 129 kcal).
  • Atún claro al natural has 30% less fat (1.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has no sugar, while Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable has 0.5 g.
  • Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable has 28% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Only Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable

THON albacore 82%, eau, sel.

Atún claro al natural

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon albacore au naturel pêche responsable or Atún claro al natural?

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Atún claro al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons