Comparison

Taste the Difference vs The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer

Overall, The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTaste the DifferenceThe Best XL Californian Styl...
Nutri-Score b —
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 248 kcal 251 kcal
Fat 3 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.2 g
Sugars 2 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.8 g —
Fiber 3.3 g 1.9 g
Protein 9.4 g 6.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer has 32% less fat (2.1 g vs 3 g).
  • The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer has 67% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer has 61% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2 g).
  • Taste the Difference has 42% more fiber (3.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Taste the Difference has 26% more protein (9.4 g vs 6.9 g).
  • The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Taste the Difference

Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Niacin, Iron, Thiamin), Sourdough Culture (Rye) (10%), Sugar, Wheat Gluten, Yeast, Salt. 2% 9% 19/ 10% 7% 500g

The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer

wheat flour,water, sodium chloride, malted barley flour, rapeseed oil

FAQ

Which is healthier: Taste the Difference or The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer?

Overall, The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Taste the Difference has fewer calories: 248 kcal versus 251 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

The Best XL Californian Style Sourdough Bloomer has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons