Tapioca Hidratada vs Fécule de pomme de terre
Overall, Tapioca Hidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tapioca Hidratada | Fécule de pomme de terre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 232 kcal | 337 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapioca Hidratada has 31% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 337 kcal).
- Fécule de pomme de terre has no fat, while Tapioca Hidratada has 0.5 g.
- Fécule de pomme de terre has no sugar, while Tapioca Hidratada has 0.5 g.
- Tapioca Hidratada has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Tapioca Hidratada has 80% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Tapioca Hidratada
Fécula de tapioca, conservante.
Fécule de pomme de terre
Fécule de pomme de terre* *=Biologique. Peut contenir des traces de noisettes et d'amandes.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tapioca Hidratada or Fécule de pomme de terre?
Overall, Tapioca Hidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tapioca Hidratada has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fécule de pomme de terre has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.