Comparison

Tapioca Hidratada vs Fecola di patate

Overall, Tapioca Hidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice
Tapioca Hidratada

Tapioca Hidratada

Pingo Doce
c NOVA 2
Fecola di patate

Fecola di patate

Pane Angeli · 250 g
c NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTapioca HidratadaFecola di patate
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 232 kcal 320 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tapioca Hidratada has 28% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 320 kcal).
  • Fecola di patate has no fat, while Tapioca Hidratada has 0.5 g.
  • Fecola di patate has no sugar, while Tapioca Hidratada has 0.5 g.
  • Tapioca Hidratada has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Tapioca Hidratada has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Tapioca Hidratada

Fécula de tapioca, conservante.

Fecola di patate

FECOLA DI PATATE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tapioca Hidratada or Fecola di patate?

Overall, Tapioca Hidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tapioca Hidratada has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fecola di patate has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Kartoffelmehl vs Fecola di patate Perles de tapioca noires vs Fecola di patate Fecola di patate vs Fécule de pomme de terre Tapioca Hidratada vs Fecola di patate Kartoffelstärke vs Tapioca Hidratada Kartoffelmehl vs Tapioca Hidratada Tapioca Hidratada vs Perles de tapioca noires Tapioca Hidratada vs Fécule de pomme de terre