Comparison
Kartoffelstärke vs Tapioca Hidratada
Overall, Tapioca Hidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kartoffelstärke | Tapioca Hidratada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 232 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapioca Hidratada has 28% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 320 kcal).
- Kartoffelstärke has no fat, while Tapioca Hidratada has 0.5 g.
- Kartoffelstärke has no sugar, while Tapioca Hidratada has 0.5 g.
- Tapioca Hidratada has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Tapioca Hidratada has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kartoffelstärke
Das Produkt kann Spuren von Laktose enthalten.
Tapioca Hidratada
Fécula de tapioca, conservante.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kartoffelstärke or Tapioca Hidratada?
Overall, Tapioca Hidratada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tapioca Hidratada has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kartoffelstärke has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.