Comparison

Tapena' Olives et Tomates vs Pâté d'olives Kalamata

Overall, Pâté d'olives Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTapena' Olives et TomatesPâté d'olives Kalamata
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 260 kcal 261 kcal
Fat 25 g 26.5 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 2.9 g
Sugars 3.2 g 0.2 g
Salt 2.6 g 3 g
Fiber 3.5 g 7.2 g
Protein 1.8 g 2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pâté d'olives Kalamata has 94% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 13% less salt (2.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Pâté d'olives Kalamata has 51% more fiber (7.2 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Pâté d'olives Kalamata has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tapena' Olives et Tomates

Olives noires 28 %, olives vertes 28 %, tomates 25 % (tomates mi-séchées concentré de tomates), huile de colza, ail, sel, sucre, persil, origan.

Pâté d'olives Kalamata

Pâté d'olive*, huile d'olive vierge extra, vinaigre de vin*, ail, origan. *produit issu de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tapena' Olives et Tomates or Pâté d'olives Kalamata?

Overall, Pâté d'olives Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tapena' Olives et Tomates has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 261 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pâté d'olives Kalamata has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons