Comparison
Tapas lomo vs Lomo Embuchado
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tapas lomo | Lomo Embuchado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 201 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 39 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapas lomo has 12% less fat (5.7 g vs 6.5 g).
- Tapas lomo has 40% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Lomo Embuchado has 19% less salt (3.5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Tapas lomo has 13% more protein (39 g vs 34 g).
Ingredients
Tapas lomo
Not available.
Lomo Embuchado
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tapas lomo or Lomo Embuchado?
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lomo Embuchado has fewer calories: 201 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tapas lomo has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.