Comparison
Lomo Embuchado vs Tapas lomo
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lomo Embuchado | Tapas lomo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 226 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 38 g | 39 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapas lomo has 29% less fat (5.7 g vs 8 g).
- Tapas lomo has 29% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Lomo Embuchado has 56% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Lomo Embuchado
Not available.
Tapas lomo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lomo Embuchado or Tapas lomo?
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tapas lomo has fewer calories: 211 kcal versus 226 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo Embuchado has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.