Filet de Saxe vs Lomo Embuchado
Overall, Filet de Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de Saxe | Lomo Embuchado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 226 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 3.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 38 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Saxe has 50% fewer calories (112 kcal vs 226 kcal).
- Filet de Saxe has 81% less fat (1.5 g vs 8 g).
- Filet de Saxe has 81% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Lomo Embuchado has 56% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Filet de Saxe has 13% less salt (3.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Lomo Embuchado has 42% more protein (38 g vs 22 g).
- Filet de Saxe has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de Saxe
96% viande de porc*, 3,4% sel*, sirop de glucose, conservateurs: acétates de sodium, nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium; antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium; extrait de levure, plantes aromatiques, épices, arôme, fumée. *Sur le produit fini. 100g de filet de saxe sont élaborés à partir de 103g de viande de porc. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, d'œuf, de soja, de lait, de fruits à coque, de céleri et de moutarde.
Lomo Embuchado
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de Saxe or Lomo Embuchado?
Overall, Filet de Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Saxe has fewer calories: 112 kcal versus 226 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo Embuchado has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.