Comparison

Filet de Saxe vs Maxi lomo

Overall, Filet de Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de SaxeMaxi lomo
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 112 kcal 105 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.4 g
Salt 3.4 g 2.6 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22 g 16.2 g
Additives46
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de Saxe has 57% less fat (1.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Filet de Saxe has 54% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Maxi lomo has 56% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Maxi lomo has 25% less salt (2.6 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Filet de Saxe has 26% more protein (22 g vs 16.2 g).
  • Only Maxi lomo lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Filet de Saxe

96% viande de porc*, 3,4% sel*, sirop de glucose, conservateurs: acétates de sodium, nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium; antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium; extrait de levure, plantes aromatiques, épices, arôme, fumée. *Sur le produit fini. 100g de filet de saxe sont élaborés à partir de 103g de viande de porc. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, d'œuf, de soja, de lait, de fruits à coque, de céleri et de moutarde.

Maxi lomo

Lombo de porco (70%), água, amido de batata, sal, dextrose, estabilizadores (trifosfato pentassódico, carragenina), antioxidantes (ascorbato de sódio, citrato de sódio), especiarias, aroma, conservante (nitrito de sódio), corantes (cochonilha, E-160b).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de Saxe or Maxi lomo?

Overall, Filet de Saxe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Maxi lomo has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Maxi lomo has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons