Tapas lomo vs Lomo
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tapas lomo | Lomo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 235 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 39 g | 39.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapas lomo has 10% fewer calories (211 kcal vs 235 kcal).
- Tapas lomo has 29% less fat (5.7 g vs 8 g).
- Tapas lomo has 31% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Lomo has 78% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Tapas lomo
Not available.
Lomo
Viande de porc, sel, poivre, sucre, ail, épices, régulateur d'acidité : citrate de trisodium, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tapas lomo or Lomo?
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tapas lomo has fewer calories: 211 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.