Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica vs Lomo
Overall, Lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raz... | Lomo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 235 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 39.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lomo has 21% fewer calories (235 kcal vs 298 kcal).
- Lomo has 53% less fat (8 g vs 17 g).
- Lomo has 51% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 6.5 g).
- Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica has 11% less salt (4 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica
Not available.
Lomo
Viande de porc, sel, poivre, sucre, ail, épices, régulateur d'acidité : citrate de trisodium, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica or Lomo?
Overall, Lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lomo has fewer calories: 235 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.