Comparison
Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica vs Tapas lomo
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica
Realvalle · 100 g
Better choice 
Tapas lomo
César Moroni · 80 g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raz... | Tapas lomo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 39 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapas lomo has 29% fewer calories (211 kcal vs 298 kcal).
- Tapas lomo has 66% less fat (5.7 g vs 17 g).
- Tapas lomo has 66% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 6.5 g).
- Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica has 67% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica
Not available.
Tapas lomo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica or Tapas lomo?
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tapas lomo has fewer calories: 211 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo de cebo ibérico 50% raza ibérica has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.