Taharama vs Nacho Cheeze
Overall, Nacho Cheeze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Taharama | Nacho Cheeze |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 279 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | 5.6 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nacho Cheeze has 63% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 279 kcal).
- Nacho Cheeze has 78% less fat (5 g vs 23 g).
- Nacho Cheeze has 75% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
- Taharama has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Taharama has 26% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
- Nacho Cheeze has 27% more fiber (5.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Nacho Cheeze has 36% more protein (7 g vs 4.5 g).
- Nacho Cheeze has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Taharama
Haricot blanc* (Origine France) 62 %, huile de colza*, jus de citrons* de Sicile, algue dulse* (Origine Bretagne) (dulse*, sel de mer) 7,6 %, sel de Guérande, poivre*, poudre de betterave* * Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique - Certification BIO par ECOCERT FR-BIO-01
Nacho Cheeze
Cannellini Beans (47%), Water, Carrots (12%), Dehydrated Inactive Yeast (6%), Onion, Rapeseed Oil, Salt, Acidity Regulator (Citric Acid), Garlic Powder, Cumin, Onion Powder, Smoked Paprika, Turmeric, Chipotle Chilli Powder.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Taharama or Nacho Cheeze?
Overall, Nacho Cheeze has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nacho Cheeze has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Taharama has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.