Sweet Plantain Chips vs Sea Salt Plantain Chips
Overall, Sweet Plantain Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Plantain Chips | Sea Salt Plantain Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 500 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 23.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.1 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 17.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet Plantain Chips has 29% less saturated fat (7.1 g vs 10 g).
- Sea Salt Plantain Chips has no sugar, while Sweet Plantain Chips has 17.9 g.
- Sweet Plantain Chips is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sweet Plantain Chips
RIPE PLANTAINS, PALM OIL
Sea Salt Plantain Chips
plantain, palm oil, sea salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Plantain Chips or Sea Salt Plantain Chips?
Overall, Sweet Plantain Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sweet Plantain Chips has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sea Salt Plantain Chips has less sugar: 0 g versus 17.9 g per 100 g.