Comparison

Süss-Sauer-Sauce vs Süß-sauer Sauce

Overall, Süss-Sauer-Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSüss-Sauer-SauceSüß-sauer Sauce
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 72 kcal 182 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 13 g 39 g
Salt 0.4 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.4 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedCelery, Gluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Süss-Sauer-Sauce has 60% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 182 kcal).
  • Süss-Sauer-Sauce has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Süss-Sauer-Sauce has 67% less sugar (13 g vs 39 g).
  • Süss-Sauer-Sauce has 78% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Süss-Sauer-Sauce has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Süss-Sauer-Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Süß-sauer Sauce lists: Celery, Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Süss-Sauer-Sauce

Waser, Tomaten (13%), Zucker, Zwiebeln (10%), Ananas (9,3%), Karotten (8,2%), Branntweinessig modifizierte Maisstärke, Grüner Paprika (2,6%), Roter Paprika (2,6%), Salz, Farbstoff (Paprikaextrakt), Gewürze.

Süß-sauer Sauce

Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, 25% Aprikosenmark, Trinkwasser, Zucker, Branntweinessig', modifizierte Stärke, Sojasauce (Trinkwasser, Sojabohnen, Weizen, Speisesalz), Speisesalz, Rapsöl, Ananassaftkonzentrat, Verdickungsmittel (Xanthan), Gewürze (mit Sellerie), natürliches Aroma. (für AT: Weingeistessig/für CH: Tafelessig)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Süss-Sauer-Sauce or Süß-sauer Sauce?

Overall, Süss-Sauer-Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Süss-Sauer-Sauce has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Süss-Sauer-Sauce has less sugar: 13 g versus 39 g per 100 g.

More comparisons