Comparison

Sugo alla norma vs Ragù di cinghiale

Overall, Ragù di cinghiale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo alla normaRagù di cinghiale
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group — 3
Calories 421 kcal 228 kcal
Fat 41 g 19 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 3.1 g
Sugars 8.8 g 4.4 g
Salt 3 g 1 g
Fiber 2.3 g 1.4 g
Protein 2.3 g 8.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedCelery, Fish, Molluscs, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ragù di cinghiale has 46% fewer calories (228 kcal vs 421 kcal).
  • Ragù di cinghiale has 54% less fat (19 g vs 41 g).
  • Ragù di cinghiale has 26% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Ragù di cinghiale has 50% less sugar (4.4 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Ragù di cinghiale has 67% less salt (1 g vs 3 g).
  • Sugo alla norma has 41% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Ragù di cinghiale has 74% more protein (8.7 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Ragù di cinghiale has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Ragù di cinghiale lists: Celery, Fish, Molluscs, Nuts.

Ingredients

Sugo alla norma

Not available.

Ragù di cinghiale

carne di cinghiale 35%, doppio Concentrato di pomodoro 20%, olio di semi di girasole, carota 8%, vino rosso, cipolla 5%, sedano 4%, sale, aglio, piante aromatiche, spezie Prodotto in uno stabilimento che utilizza derivati del latte soia, frutta a guscio, pesce e molluschi

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo alla norma or Ragù di cinghiale?

Overall, Ragù di cinghiale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ragù di cinghiale has fewer calories: 228 kcal versus 421 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ragù di cinghiale has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 8.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons