Ragù di cinghiale vs Macco di fave
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ragù di cinghiale | Macco di fave |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 228 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Fish, Molluscs, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Macco di fave has 52% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 228 kcal).
- Macco di fave has 81% less fat (3.7 g vs 19 g).
- Macco di fave has 81% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Macco di fave has 46% less sugar (2.4 g vs 4.4 g).
- Macco di fave has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Ragù di cinghiale has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Ragù di cinghiale has 27% more protein (8.7 g vs 6.3 g).
- Macco di fave has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ragù di cinghiale lists: Celery, Fish, Molluscs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Ragù di cinghiale
carne di cinghiale 35%, doppio Concentrato di pomodoro 20%, olio di semi di girasole, carota 8%, vino rosso, cipolla 5%, sedano 4%, sale, aglio, piante aromatiche, spezie Prodotto in uno stabilimento che utilizza derivati del latte soia, frutta a guscio, pesce e molluschi
Macco di fave
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ragù di cinghiale or Macco di fave?
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Macco di fave has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Macco di fave has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.