Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo vs Macco di fave
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo | Macco di fave |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo has 29% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Macco di fave has 45% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Macco di fave has 58% less sugar (2.4 g vs 5.7 g).
- Macco di fave has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Macco di fave has 35% more protein (6.3 g vs 4.1 g).
- Macco di fave has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo
50% polpa di pomodoro, 20% pancetta suina, 13% concentrato di pomodo 9% cipolla, amido modificato di mais, 2% prezzemolo, zucchero, sale, arom di affumicatura, pepe nero, aroma naturale, peperoncino, correttore acidità: acido lattico.
Macco di fave
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo or Macco di fave?
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugo Amatriciana Italiamo has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Macco di fave has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.