Comparison

Sugo alla norma vs Macco di fave

Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Sugo alla norma	Macco di fave
Nutri-Score	e	a
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	421 kcal	109 kcal
Fat	41 g	3.7 g
Saturated fat	4.2 g	0.6 g
Sugars	8.8 g	2.4 g
Salt	3 g	0.1 g
Fiber	2.3 g	0 g
Protein	2.3 g	6.3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Macco di fave has 74% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 421 kcal).
Macco di fave has 91% less fat (3.7 g vs 41 g).
Macco di fave has 86% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 4.2 g).
Macco di fave has 73% less sugar (2.4 g vs 8.8 g).
Macco di fave has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 3 g).
Sugo alla norma has 100% more fiber (2.3 g vs 0 g).
Macco di fave has 64% more protein (6.3 g vs 2.3 g).
Macco di fave has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sugo alla norma

Not available.

Macco di fave

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo alla norma or Macco di fave?

Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Macco di fave has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 421 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Macco di fave has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 8.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

LEGÙ 100% Vegetale vs Sugo alla norma Sugo alla norma vs Pesto cavolo riccio Pesto cavolo riccio vs Macco di fave Sugo alla norma vs Ragù di cinghiale Ragù di cinghiale vs Macco di fave Sugo Amatriciana Italiam... vs Sugo alla norma Sugo Amatriciana Italiam... vs Macco di fave Sugo alla norma vs Sugo alla norcina con ta...