Comparison

Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico vs Sugo al Basilico

Overall, Sugo al Basilico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E...Sugo al Basilico
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 132 kcal 68 kcal
Fat 11 g 4 g
Saturated fat 2 g 0.6 g
Sugars 3.5 g 5.3 g
Salt 2.2 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 4 g 1.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo al Basilico has 48% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 132 kcal).
  • Sugo al Basilico has 64% less fat (4 g vs 11 g).
  • Sugo al Basilico has 70% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2 g).
  • Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico has 34% less sugar (3.5 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Sugo al Basilico has 59% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico has 65% more protein (4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Only Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico

Tomaten 40% (Pomodoro S. Marzano D.O.P.), Tomatenpulpe 40%, Olivenöl extra vergine <Terre di Bari> D.0.P. 8%, Schafkäse 8%(Pecorino Romano D.0.P [Italien]), Basilikum 1,5%, Knoblauch, schwarzer Pfeffer, Meersalz. Kochsalzgehalt insgesamt: 1,0%.

Sugo al Basilico

polpa pomodoro 75 passata pomodoro 18 cipolla olio extravergine d'oliva basilico 2,5 doppio concentrato pomodoro sale zucchero acido citrico

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico or Sugo al Basilico?

Overall, Sugo al Basilico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo al Basilico has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 132 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo Al Pomodoro Pecorino E Basilico has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons