Sugar snaps vs Kefen
Overall, Kefen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugar snaps | Kefen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugar snaps has 55% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Kefen has no fat, while Sugar snaps has 0.5 g.
- Sugar snaps has 54% less sugar (2.3 g vs 5 g).
- Kefen has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kefen has 27% more fiber (3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kefen has 18% more protein (4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Kefen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sugar snaps
Snap peas.
Kefen
Pois mange-tout
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugar snaps or Kefen?
Overall, Kefen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugar snaps has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugar snaps has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.