Comparison
Zuckerschoten vs Kefen
Overall, Zuckerschoten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zuckerschoten | Kefen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zuckerschoten has 22% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Zuckerschoten has 38% less sugar (3.1 g vs 5 g).
- Zuckerschoten has 26% more protein (5.4 g vs 4 g).
- Zuckerschoten has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Zuckerschoten
Zuckerschoten
Kefen
Pois mange-tout
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zuckerschoten or Kefen?
Overall, Zuckerschoten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zuckerschoten has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zuckerschoten has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 5 g per 100 g.