Comparison
Zuckerschoten vs Fagiolini piattoni
Overall, Fagiolini piattoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zuckerschoten | Fagiolini piattoni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fagiolini piattoni has 11% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Fagiolini piattoni has 29% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Fagiolini piattoni has 21% more fiber (3.8 g vs 3 g).
- Zuckerschoten has 37% more protein (5.4 g vs 3.4 g).
Ingredients
Zuckerschoten
Zuckerschoten
Fagiolini piattoni
FAGIOLINI PIATTONI
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zuckerschoten or Fagiolini piattoni?
Overall, Fagiolini piattoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fagiolini piattoni has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fagiolini piattoni has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.