Comparison
Zuckerschoten vs Pois gourmand
Overall, Zuckerschoten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zuckerschoten | Pois gourmand |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zuckerschoten has 22% less sugar (3.1 g vs 4 g).
- Zuckerschoten has 12% more fiber (3 g vs 2.6 g).
- Zuckerschoten has 43% more protein (5.4 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Zuckerschoten
Zuckerschoten
Pois gourmand
Pois gourmand
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zuckerschoten or Pois gourmand?
Overall, Zuckerschoten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pois gourmand has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zuckerschoten has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.